Analytics and Technology Assisted Review - Technical and Legal Implications in eDiscovery
Please fill out the form to view the recorded webinar.
Occurred on Thursday, January 19, 2017
As the amount of data within a corporation increases, it is crucial to take advantage of the analytic tools available. Culling down the amount of data in an eDiscovery project is the key component in cutting costs in one of the most expensive parts of litigation. Once that data is culled, how do you decide which of these technology tools is a good fit for your case?
This one-hour complimentary webinar will cover:
- Evolution of analytic tools
- Explanation of six key tools including:
- Email threading
- Textual near duping
- Conceptual analytics
- Keyword expansion
- Pros and cons of Technology Assisted Review (TAR)
- How to determine whether TAR is a good fit for a case
- The legal acceptance of TAR
- Examples of when TAR was used in internal investigations
Panelists will include Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP's Aharon Kaye and Kyle Finnegan and eTERA's Emily Goodwin Kime.
Aharon Kaye, Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Aharon Kaye concentrates his practice on complex civil litigation and white collar criminal defense, representing corporations and individuals in antitrust, securities, tax, consumer fraud- and health care fraud-related disputes. He represents clients throughout all stages of litigation and arbitration, and in connection with internal investigations, criminal and civil government investigations, sensitive audits and negotiated resolutions with various regulatory bodies, including the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Internal Revenue Service, Illinois Attorney General and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Kyle Finnegan, Associate, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Kyle Finnegan focuses his practice in litigation and dispute resolution matters. His practice includes complex contractual matters, as well as investigations by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). His responsibilities includes coordinating pre-suit investigations, managing discovery, and motion practice in state and federal court. Before joining Katten, Kyle externed for the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and at the Cook County State's Attorney's Office.
Emily Goodwin Kime, Senior Consultant, eTERA Consulting
As Senior Consultant with over 15 years of litigation support experience, Emily is responsible for the day-to-day management of litigation projects ensuring that client requirements are defined and fully met for all phases of eDiscovery engagements including collections, processing, review, hosting and production. Emily oversees the proper communication flow and coordination of project resources, client training, work schedules, deadlines and quality control processes. She also consults with clients on complex data searches, metrics and reporting.